Search for: "U.S. v. STATE OF TEXAS"
Results 161 - 180
of 8,462
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
The agency explained that the ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm
(Even then, it's nothing like the U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
On 4 March 2023, the Justices of the U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
The government claims that the Texas-based writer “antagonized” police officers when they blocked his effort to get through a door. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 7:26 pm
Migrants wait to be processed at the U.S. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:26 pm
Specifically, he cited Arizona v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:59 am
Meanwhile, a Texas state court held that a Canadian judgment did not violate Texas public policy even though it awarded speculative damages. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
Access Corp. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
Indiana, 414 U.S. 105, 109 (1973) (emphasis added); see also Brandenburg v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:12 am
U.S. and Cantero v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
In a pending case regarding Texas’s authority to construct a 1,000-foot barrier in the Rio Grande, Texas has resurfaced the migration‑as‑invasion theory of the Constitution. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
In Doe v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:20 am
The U.S. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
A federal judge in Austin, Texas put that state’s law on hold before it could go into effect, but the U.S. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm
A panel of the U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
As we know, however, Texas continued to refine its primary rules to exclude Black people, and although Nixon won another challenge to the Texas process in Nixon v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
A claimant who merely “does business in this state” and accesses platforms from another state (or country, perhaps) can still sue platforms for not following Texas's rules. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 11:26 am
The Texas case, Paxton, concerns Texas’ state law H.B. 20. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
Texas Governor Greg Abbott reacted with a statement claiming that the Constitution grants states a right to defend themselves against “invasion,” and that Texas authority “supersedes any federal statutes to the contrary. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
The most obvious class of examples, as I discussed on Monday and as I explain at greater length in the article, consists of so-called "percentage" plans by which various states guarantee admission to a state university to students graduating in a specified top percentage of their respective high school classes.For example, in his dissent in Fisher v. [read post]
