Search for: "U.S. v. Sol*"
Results 161 - 180
of 26,800
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 4:50 am
” In the case law, there is something of a presumption in favor of intervention: “Whether intervention is sought as a matter of right under CPLR 1012 (a), or as a matter of discretion under CPLR 1013, is of little practical significance since a timely motion for leave to intervene should be granted, in either event, where the intervenor has a real and substantial interest in the outcome of the proceedings” (Maggi v U.S. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:55 am
” Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm
., “state-authorized or state-chartered financial institutions”[3]—which, based on a plain reading of the Financial Institutions Codes, include Florida state-chartered banks, trust companies and credit unions, as well as Florida state-licensed branches, agencies, administrative offices, and representative offices of non-U.S. banks;[4] consumer finance lenders licensed under Chapter 516 of the Florida Statutes; and money services businesses licensed under Chapter 560 of the… [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
Circuit’s application of the Fitzgerald test in Blassingame v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:25 am
This is especially true in “small business” bankruptcies under Subchapter V. [read post]
10 May 2024, 3:27 am
See State v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:55 am
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., 572 U.S. 663 (2014). [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
“Obscenity” is one of a few categories of speech that may be regulated by states consistent with the First Amendment (see Penal Law § 235.00).[4] The U.S. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
“Obscenity” is one of a few categories of speech that may be regulated by states consistent with the First Amendment (see Penal Law § 235.00).[4] The U.S. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:55 am
Recently, U.S. [read post]
9 May 2024, 4:05 am
In Billard v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm
With respect to retirement savings, the most recent version of the U.S. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:01 pm
Were you in the federal courthouse in Philadelphia on Tuesday and did you manage to get a picture of the attorney who reportedly wore a Grover head during opening statements in Burns v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:43 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 12:30 pm
Bissonnette v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
Source: USPTO Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:20 am
v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:06 am
In the year after Plessy v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Asserting that “a relevant antitrust market can be defined solely based on qualitative evidence regarding market characteristics,” the FTC devotes just a single paragraph of its complaint to the hypothetical monopolist test, which was a mainstay of market definition in under the old merger guidelines. [read post]
