Search for: "U.S. v. Sosa"
Results 161 - 180
of 203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2018, 7:09 am
” 466 U.S. at 123. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 5:40 pm
" 466 U.S. at 123. [read post]
4 May 2012, 10:21 am
McMillan has precedents at the ready: Sosa, Quirin, and, unsurprisingly, Justice Stevens’ opinion in Hamdan v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:10 am
See Princz v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 6:05 am
In Doe v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 7:47 pm
The Court appeared to cite Filartiga with approval in its 2004 Sosa decision. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 7:09 am
And in Sosa v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 2:47 pm
Kentucky v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
Supreme Court case construing the act, Sosa v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 4:57 pm
First, according to the Court in the Kiobel decision, ATS cases are subject to the presumption against extraterritoriality recently rearticulated in Morrison v. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:13 am
” Scalia repeatedly warned about the application of international law as precedent in U.S. cases, including in his concurring opinion in Sosa v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 11:01 am
See, e.g., Matar v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:43 pm
” Repeatedly invoking the Supreme Court’s call for caution in Sosa, the Court emphasizes that the ATS is “no license for judicial innovation” and that “judicial restraint is demanded. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:52 pm
This morning the Supreme Court granted cert in DaimlerChrysler AG v Bauman, an ATS suit against Daimler. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
Moreover, the causes of action under the ATS, the Supreme Court’s 2004 language in Sosa v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 5:38 pm
Litigation under the Alien Tort Statute is now almost impossible for environmental plaintiffs to win because the Supreme Court set the bar so high when it decided Sosa v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 6:29 pm
Citing Sosa v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:49 pm
In 2004, in Sosa v Alvarez-Machain, the Supreme Court affirmed that the ATS still provides jurisdiction for international tort claims, but it cautioned federal courts not to recognize claims “for violations of any international law norm with less definite content and acceptance among civilized nations than the historical paradigms” familiar when the law was enacted. [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:42 pm
Lohengrin Revealed: The Implications of Sosa v. [read post]
