Search for: "UP-039 - State v. Day" Results 161 - 180 of 10,339
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
SCOTUS Ducking the Trump Eligibility Question Now will Pressure the Court to Rule in his Favor Later
16 Feb 2024, 7:56 am by Michael C. Dorf
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
Privacy Isn't Dead. Far From It.
13 Feb 2024, 4:07 pm by Jason Kelley
Some people say that Americans have given up on privacy. [read post]
Deeplinks Blog - https://www.eff.org/deeplinks
[Eugene Volokh] Alleged Neo-Nazi Loses Libel Lawsuit
12 Feb 2024, 5:52 am by Eugene Volokh
Weaver subsequently thanked his supporters who had left the reviews and stated, "I'm just getting warmed up! [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Tucker Carlson: The Vladimir Putin Interview--Video and Transcript (English and Russian)
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
Putin ("President Vladimir V. [read post]
Law at the End of the Day - https://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part IV: Justice Sotomayor and Kagan get the line between national power and federalism
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm by Josh Blackman
There was a tension in yesterday's oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Eugene Volokh] Students Don't Have Right to Lie About Administrators
9 Feb 2024, 2:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Judge Robert Jonker's opinion today in Ashton v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part III: Justice Kavanaugh Gets Griffin's Case  and Justice Barrett gets FedCourts
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm by Josh Blackman
The very first question of the day came from Justice Thomas. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
SCOTUS dispatch: ‘in the room where it happened’ for the oral arguments in the Trump v. Anderson ballot disqualification case
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm by Marissa Zupancic | U. Pittsburgh School of Law, US
She'll be keeping us updated with any developments. pic.twitter.com/d8I9vNyy3x — JURIST (@JURISTnews) February 8, 2024 In a JURIST explainer I published in the days leading up to the oral arguments, I examined Trump’s submissions, the Colorado voters’ submissions, efforts in other states to remove him from the ballot, as well as the unprecedented nature of the case. [read post]
JURIST - Paper Chase - https://www.jurist.org/news/
Lietz v. Lietz (Cal. Ct. App. - Feb. 8, 2024)
9 Feb 2024, 11:55 am
Burke, doesn't actually show up. [read post]
California Appellate Report - http://calapp.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part II: Justice Jackson Gets "Office under the United States"
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
(Sotomayor made a number of errors throughout the day, which I will discuss below.) [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Eugene Volokh] If Lawyer Representing Himself Is "Unable to Keep His Personal Feelings out of His Pleadings and the Way He Litigates This Case,"
9 Feb 2024, 8:41 am by Eugene Volokh
"] From Judge Kent Wetherell's decision yesterday in Kassenoff v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Eugene Volokh] "Seven Questions on Section 3: A Response to Professor Kurt Lash"
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Floyd's efforts heightened the threat to the Capitol in the weeks leading up to Lincoln's inauguration. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
:@WilliamBaude: The Facts Matter, Trials Matter, The Record Matters
8 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Will Baude
In Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Six: The Two “Off-Ramp” Arguments Based Upon In re Griffin’s Case that Would Allow the Supreme Court to Avoid Deciding Whether Trump is Eligible to be President
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
 Colorado is not taking any steps to "enforce" Section 3's disqualification rule. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
:@WilliamBaude: The Use and Misuse of Section Three's "Legislative History": Part II
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
Today we take up some problems with Lash's use of constitutional legislative history, even where accurately recounted, in the course of legal analysis of the Constitution's text. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Jonathan H. Adler] DOJ Files Writ of Mandamus to End Juliana Climate Litigation
6 Feb 2024, 7:12 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Juliana v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
:@WilliamBaude: The Objection: "But He Hasn't Been Convicted Of Anything"
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude
"  Trump's brief on the merits in the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Five: Trump’s Argument That He Did Not Engage in an Insurrection
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents' Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant's VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Fund v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
:@WilliamBaude: The Objection That Enforcing Section Three Would Be Too "Dangerous"
4 Feb 2024, 11:30 am by Will Baude
  The Supreme Court's unanimous landmark decision in Brown v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/