Search for: "US v. Dallas Harris" Results 161 - 170 of 170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2008, 9:11 pm
Presumably that's why the city saw fit to contract out the menial task to a private mom-and-pop operation, rather than using its own workers, not to mention officials.Tooke v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Out-of-state employers, insurers, employee benefit plan vendors, and other businesses registered to do business in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, or another state that requires that out-of-state businesses consent to jurisdiction as a condition of their registration to do business in the state face a heightened risk of getting hauled into court in the consent to jurisdiction state following last month’s Supreme Court decision in Mallory v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Joining us tonight is Kate Cox, a wife and mother from Dallas. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 10:00 am by Michael Grossman
When you take issue with a belief or position, one argument you can employ is called reductio ad absurdum, which sounds like a Harry Potter spell but is actually the Latin phrase “reducing to absurdity. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 10:11 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
IDR Process Suspended The IDR process currently is suspended following the August 3 , 2023 ruling by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Texas Medical Association v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:38 am
    The Structure of Common Interest Communities  Common interest communities consist of properties that are burdened with restrictions controlling the use of the property, requiring homeowners to pay assessments for maintenance of the community property, and assessing fines for violations. [11]  The restrictions are imposed in the community’s declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions, the bylaws, and the rules adopted… [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Dawn Harris-Young, EPA, March 8, 2010 Norfolk Southern Railway Company has agreed to pay $4 million penalty to resolve alleged violations of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and hazardous materials laws for a 2005 chlorine spill in Graniteville, S.C., the Justice Department and U.S. [read post]