Search for: "US v. Fowler" Results 161 - 180 of 308
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2015, 5:18 am by Elina Saxena
Fowler’s new book Watchdogs on the Hill: The Decline of Congressional Oversight of U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 10:02 am by Lyle Denniston
 (10-277) — scope of right to bring class-action lawsuit for sex discrimination on the job; also question added by the Court Fowler v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:35 am by Josh Blackman
Since then, James was hired as an associate professor at the Chapman University Fowler School of Law. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:59 am
Even chickens have trade secretsPhoto by Alex Harries The basic rule applicable to all employees, from the case of Faccenda Chicken v Fowler [1987] Ch 117 is that if an employee is entrusted with confidential information which is "of a sufficiently high degree of confidentiality as to amount to a trade secret", the duty of confidence continues after the termination of the contract of employment. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:30 pm
The wonderfully named Vanderhum and Doriemus is back with us. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Washington, DC lawyer Ronald Wick of Cozen O’Connor on the firm’s blog, Class Action Defense Review Flip, Flop – Beware Short Sale Scams – Fort Myers lawyer David Fowler of Henderson Franklin on the firm’s blog, The Legal Scoop on Southwest Florida Real Estate  Internet Fraud: How to Spot a Possible Scam on the Web – Corporate investigator Philip Segal of Charles Griffin Intelligence on their blog, The… [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:54 am
 According to Caterpillar,despite the requirement laid down by the Court of Appeal in Faccenda Chicken Ltd v Fowler [1987] Ch 117 and Roger Bullivant Ltd v Ellis (1987) ICR 464 that the confidential information be identified, the court could still apply the principle established by the House of Lords in Bolkiah v KPMG [1998] UKHL 52 that an ex-employee can be barred from carrying out specified work for a new employer unless that employee is able to… [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
 See [Restatement (Second) of Torts §§ 901, cmt. a (1979)]; 4 [Fowler V. [read post]