Search for: "US v. Hart" Results 161 - 180 of 1,000
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2021, 7:29 pm by Francis Pileggi
It applies Section 327 of the Delaware General Corporation Law using the state supreme court’s ruling in 7547 Partners v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 6:47 am by Chukwuma Okoli
Indeed, some Nigerian judges have rightly held that choice of venue rules are not supposed to be used to determine matters of jurisdiction in Nigerian conflict of laws.[7] Choice of venue rules are used to determine which judicial division within a State (in the case of the State High Court) or judicial division within the Nigerian Federation (in the case of the Federal High Court) has jurisdiction. [read post]
13 May 2021, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
In parallel, v-Lex has taken a cross-border route to build, with strategic acquisitions such as Justis and the creation of strategic partnerships, to allow it to compete more effectively, rather than to claim that it was a credible legal information provider without such assistance. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:23 am by Giles Peaker
The correct test for a breach was Proudfoot v Hart (1890) 25 QBD 41 – “’Good tenantable repair’ is such repair as, having regard to the age, character and locality of the house, would make it reasonably fit for the occupation of a reasonably-minded tenant of the class who would be likely to take it”. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 5:13 pm
John Hart Ely, Democracy and Distrust 18 (1980). [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 11:04 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Enrico Bonadio, Protecting Art in the Street (Dokument Press 2020)Jane Ginsburg, Deep Dive: Burrow-Giles Lithographing v. [read post]
The rights of third-country nationals migrating to the EU have largely been constructed under the terms of Part Three, Title V, Chapter 3 TFEU, particularly arts 78-79 thereof. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 3:46 am by Chukwuma Okoli
Those answers must be reached using all of the information available, which is why the common law action must somehow be revived. [read post]
That’s because the sexual content can be used as evidence to show other nonsexual negative treatment was motivated by discriminatory intent. [read post]