Search for: "US v. Perry"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,631
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2017, 8:00 am
Perry, 2017 U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In Perry and United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 7:56 am
On July 14, Judge Perry granted a motion to certify a class made up of lawyers in Downing v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 4:38 pm
(Dale Carpenter) Today, at the request of the 9th Circuit, the California Supreme Court agreed to address the question whether there is anything in California law that would give the official proponents of Prop 8 standing in the federal case challenging it, Perry v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:36 am
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:36 am
In Pino v. [read post]
Updated: Amicus briefs in support of the Proposition 8 respondents and DOMA respondent Edith Windsor
1 Mar 2013, 7:37 am
Perry and respondent Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 12:42 pm
[Varnum v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 10:42 am
Perry v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 10:41 am
From National Law Review: On June 26, 2013, the US Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court”) struck down Section 3 of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) as unconstitutional in the case of United States v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:52 am
Countrymark Refining and Logistics, LLC v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 11:44 am
Perry, 2018 U.S. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 9:56 am
In Defries v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 1:13 pm
The Supreme Court is currently deciding on a challenge by the original proponents of Proposition 8 to keep the video of the Perry v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:23 am
This change is primarily in response to the Utah Supreme Court's decision in the Southam v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 6:09 am
Perry, 2009 U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:12 am
Perry, Seventh Circuit: Appellant twice violated the terms of his supervised release. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:04 am
The ruling, in Perry v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Perry, in which the Court held that the sponsors of California’s ban on same-sex marriage lacked standing to defend the initiative on appeal, and United States v. [read post]
