Search for: "US v. Robert Ross" Results 161 - 180 of 369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary comes from Ross Runkel at his eponymous blog. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
Ross Runkel discusses the brief at his eponymous blog. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for Forbes, Robert Alt weighs in on Janus v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel looks at the cert petition in Evans v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on McCoy v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am by Dan Carvajal
Commercial Activity Tax Liability by Gross Receipts Range[3] Annual Gross Receipts Minimum Tax Liability CAT Liability $0 – $150,000 n/a n/a $150,001 – $1,000,000 $150 n/a $1,000,001 – $2,000,000 $800 0.26% on receipts > $1 million $2,000,001 – $4,000,000 $2,100 0.26% on receipts > $1 million $4,000,001+ $2,600 0.26% on receipts > $1 million The tax casts a broad net, applying to any person or business which “owns or uses any capital in Ohio, is… [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that “extraordinary developments in Wisconsin,” where partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel discusses the court’s decision to review Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Ross Runkel and Federalist Society podcast with Karen Harned on McLane Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
Events Please let us know if there are any media and law events which you would like us to list. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel discusses the court’s decision on Tuesday in Coventry Health Care of Missouri v. [read post]