Search for: "US v. Short"
Results 161 - 180
of 22,298
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2013, 12:55 pm
(It is noted parenthetically: "We frown on excessive use of acronyms, but in a case involving a 24-letter word, we think it appropriate to use HCFCs for hydrochlorofluorocarbons.") [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 11:06 am
EPA and Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 10:59 am
They called a ton of us out to check us for contraband, told us to strip down to our prison-provided boxer shorts, and assigned trainees to search us. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 8:27 am
It provides a very useful short summary of the workings of Twitter for those who are unfamiliar with the way in which it operates. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:54 am
, 2019 WL 1448448 (SDNY March 18, 2019) The post Blogger’s Screenshot of a Newspaper Page Qualifies as Fair Use–Clark v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 7:34 am
Spencer v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 9:57 am
It’s easy to read United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
” Davis v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 3:22 am
Not according to a recent decision by a California intermediate appellate court in Jarvis v Jarvis, No. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 10:43 am
In Matter of DaimlerChrysler Corp. v Spitzer, 2006 NY Slip Op 09322, the New York Court of Appeals answered this riddle for us. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 3:12 pm
Williams, 2006 WL 3438188 (decided yesterday), and uses this as a justification for interpreting a state ban on possessing short-barreled shotguns as... [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 9:45 pm
After a short quiet spell, class actions return with a splash. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:38 am
In Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 11:43 am
On May 21, in Epic Systems v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 3:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 5:30 am
The doors have now been opened to new issues such as copyright abuse or misuse, or the argument that copyright law cannot be used to limit free trade in [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 10:14 pm
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 6:41 pm
Although this short post does not qualify as breaking news, it will be a useful reminder for some: The Delaware Court of Chancery prefers “stockholder” as the term uniformly used in the Delaware General Corporation Law for those owning a corporation, though in the past, especially prior to the 2010 DGCL amendments, there were inconsistent references–and court decisions in the past have not always been scrupulous in observing the distinction. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 11:10 am
See, e.g., Davis v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:19 pm
Seidman's got a cheeky and funny short reply to Waldron, entitled, appropriately enough, "Why Jeremy Waldron Really Agrees With Me." [read post]
