Search for: "US v. Smart" Results 161 - 180 of 3,009
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2012, 4:30 am by Debra Vey Voda-Hamilton
Instead of shrinking away and plowing on as a “smart, savvy, tough and natural litigator”, as Ms. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 1:18 pm
  He uses many big words in order to drive home the point - Selya is very smart. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 3:41 pm
Over the past 24 hours there have been well over 100 blog posts about the recent ruling in the Lenz v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 10:15 am by Brendan Kevenides
 With the decision the Court provided some important clarification regarding how a jury should be instructed in cases arising from injuries caused by an activity performed negligently by a local municipality.The case, Smart v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:00 pm
The state Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Jan. 18 in the case of State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 4:47 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes observes that although, “[a]s smart as they are, Supreme Court justices sometimes falter when they predict the consequences of their decisions,” Justice Antonin Scalia’s predictions on same-sex marriage – made in his dissent in United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 6:37 pm by Andrew Raff
Here are a few notable reactions to the DC Circuit's Comcast v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:32 pm by Florian Mueller
It's been a few years since I last woke up to a significant procedural order ("signficant" as opposed to lawyers' appearances being approved) in Oracle v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 11:22 am by The Complex Litigator
 Wagering on appellate court outcomes after listening to oral arguments is not a smart use of gambling funds in most instances, and it seems dangerous here as well. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 8:08 pm by Tom Smith
Board of Education (1954) and helped shape civil-rights law as it comes down to us to this day. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 10:35 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
What Cochran Means For Employers With the proliferation of dual-use devices and BYOD policies, the extent to which employees should be reimbursed for work-related use of their personal cell phone or smart phone is an issue that this new Court of Appeal decision makes even more complicated. [read post]