Search for: "US v. Spears" Results 161 - 180 of 361
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2012, 9:49 am by Lyle Denniston
Spears — lawyers’ access to private driver’s license records for use in preparing lawsuits Mon., January 14: 11-9335 — Alleyne v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:22 am
Govern, Operation Neptune Spear: Was Killing Bin Laden a Legitimate Military Objective? [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 11:48 am
U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, December 10, 2009 Spears v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 6:02 am by Susan Brenner
“would use Encase would be to open up contraband image files from Spears’ computer. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
https://t.co/hOWmgOsg27 -> Internet data dispute splits US Supreme Court – Business https://t.co/bmKcyoPFq5 -> Lawrence Lessig drops out of presidential race https://t.co/QR82f68XWP -> Maybe Spotify Isn’t Killing The Music Industry After All | FiveThirtyEight https://t.co/f2mLnAgoyi -> EU Parliament Adopts New Net Neutrality Rules Allowing Content Optimized Services https://t.co/8X9FWlZl2o -> A Proper Copyright Assignment https://t.co/ulRFlnEp0R ->… [read post]
28 May 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
In the case of Mohamed v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 2:19 pm
Before anyone else emails the IPKat to let him know, he can tell you that he is fully aware of the two big trade mark rulings from the Court of Appeal for England and Wales last Friday in Société Des Produits Nestlé S.A. v Cadbury UK Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1174 and JW Spear & Son Ltd, Mattel Inc and Mattel UK Ltd v Zynga Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 1175 and he will be providing separate Katposts on them in the fullness of time. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
.), or where the arbitrator " 'manifestly disregard[s]' the substantive law applicable to the parties' dispute" (Schiferle v Capital Fence Co., Inc., 155 AD3d 122, 127 [4th Dept 2017], quoting Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, 479 [2006], cert dismissed 548 US 940 [2006]; see Matter of Gerber v Goldberg Segalla LLP, 199 AD3d 1354, 1355 [4th Dept 2021]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
.), or where the arbitrator " 'manifestly disregard[s]' the substantive law applicable to the parties' dispute" (Schiferle v Capital Fence Co., Inc., 155 AD3d 122, 127 [4th Dept 2017], quoting Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, 479 [2006], cert dismissed 548 US 940 [2006]; see Matter of Gerber v Goldberg Segalla LLP, 199 AD3d 1354, 1355 [4th Dept 2021]). [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:33 am by Terry Hart
Spear, 520 US 154, 173 (1997) (quoting US v. [read post]