Search for: "USA v. GRANT"
Results 161 - 180
of 3,227
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Republican Governors Gave Lucrative, No-Bid COVID-19 Deals to Utah Firms, Who Then Gave $1M to GOP Campaigns Yahoo News – Craig Harris, Bailey Schulz, and Katie Wedell (USA Today) | Published: 7/27/2022 A small number of companies leveraged their connections to sign deals to provide COVID-19 tests and personal protective equipment that would pay them at least $219 million in five GOP-led states. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 7:46 am
The court granted a petition for rehearing filed by HEC Pharm Co., Ltd. and HEC Pharm USA Inc., vacated its prior decision, and reversed the district court’s judgment that the claims of patent at issue were not invalid (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 5:00 am
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 7:01 am
Circuit held in Trump v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 8:55 pm
Nestle USA v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 3:44 am
In an order entered March 6, 2019, the Supreme Court granted the motion, and the plaintiff appeals. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 2:08 am
Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 1:17 pm
[4] USA Today wanted to know “Who’s the best on the block? [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:30 am
The Supreme Court has granted cert in this case. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
Matter of Brancato v New York City Tr. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
Matter of Brancato v New York City Tr. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
The petition also fails to adequately allege that ACS violated the Family Medical Leave Act, as petitioner did not assert that he had worked for ACS for 12 months or 1,250 hours, and thus failed to demonstrate that he was an eligible employee under 29 USC § 2611(2)(A)(ii) (see Donahue v Asia TV USA Ltd., 208 F Supp 3d 505, 512 [SD NY 2016]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
The petition also fails to adequately allege that ACS violated the Family Medical Leave Act, as petitioner did not assert that he had worked for ACS for 12 months or 1,250 hours, and thus failed to demonstrate that he was an eligible employee under 29 USC § 2611(2)(A)(ii) (see Donahue v Asia TV USA Ltd., 208 F Supp 3d 505, 512 [SD NY 2016]). [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 7:36 am
The Ninth Circuit also, however, remanded the case for a further determination as to whether Fiat Chrysler had adequately disclosed its relationship with, and qualifications to use, Bluetooth technology, as it was required to do under limits previously placed on the first sale doctrine (Bluetooth SIG Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 7:21 pm
GN Audio USA, Inc. (9th Cir. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
Comer (2017); Espinoza v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 5:01 am
Twenty-two years earlier, in Smith v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court overturn Roe v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 8:43 pm
§ 112(a), in PureCircle USA Inc. v. [read post]