Search for: "Uber Technologies, Inc."
Results 161 - 180
of 511
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2020, 5:12 am
Kalanick (Jan. 13, 2020), the Delaware Supreme Court upheld the Court of Chancery’s decision that dismissed a derivative suit brought by a stockholder of Uber Technologies, Inc. [read post]
28 May 2020, 8:26 pm
The state statute codified into law the California Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 1:57 pm
According to Bloomberg, “ride-sharing services such as Uber Technologies Inc. [read post]
29 May 2018, 1:57 pm
According to Bloomberg, “ride-sharing services such as Uber Technologies Inc. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 10:07 am
Uber Technologies, Inc. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 6:40 am
Uber Technologies, Inc., March 30, 2016, Chen, E.). [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 11:31 am
O'Connor v Uber Technologies - Order Denying Uber's Motion for Summary Judgment [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 11:06 am
Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 1023 EDA 2021 (Pa. [read post]
4 May 2023, 12:58 pm
Uber Technologies, Inc., (Uber), accepting Justice Sotomayor’s invitation in Viking River Cruises to have the “last word” on whether an employee forced to arbitrate their individual Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) claims maintains statutory standing to pursue PAGA claims on a representative basis within the court system, based on violations other employees suffered. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 10:03 am
Uber Technologies Inc. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:54 am
Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No. 20-16030 (9th Cir. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 12:05 pm
Enlarge / Travis Kalanick, CEO of Uber Technologies Inc., at the Noah technology conference in Berlin in 2016. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 11:01 am
Uber Technologies, Inc., is currently pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (Case No. 17-00939). [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 6:46 am
The litigation involves current and former Uber Technologies Inc. drivers in Massachusetts and California who brought claims alleging that they were improperly classified as independent contractors rather than as employees. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 1:33 pm
For example, Uber Technologies Inc., in a recent announcement, said “those who work at the San Francisco company for at least four years can sell as much as 10 percent of their shares. [read post]
19 May 2021, 9:01 pm
Uber Technologies, Inc., a district court relied on pre-Circuit City law in the D.C. [read post]
7 May 2020, 4:15 am
On May 5, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) reversed a decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in Uber Technologies, Inc., v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 6:23 am
Uber Technologies, Inc., September 7, 2016, Clifton, R.). [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 5:25 am
The plaintiffs in the Florida litigation sought to centralize the cases there; the other plaintiffs (and defendants) opposed the move (In Re: Uber Technologies, Inc. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 6:28 am
Kalanick and Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 15-CV-9796 (E.D. [read post]
