Search for: "United Public Workers v. State "
Results 161 - 180
of 2,658
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2023, 2:02 am
In one recent case, EEOC v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm
While courts generally recognize and enforce contractual agreements by a party to consent to jurisdiction, mere registration of an out-of-state business to do business in a state historically has not been recognized as creating the necessary “substantial minimum contacts” that the Due Process clause of the United States Constitution generally requires exist to provide the general personal jurisdiction that must exist for a state court to… [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 12:09 pm
In recent years, the conventional wisdom has been that remote employees living in other states throughout the United States would not be able to avail themselves of the employee-friendly employment laws found in Massachusetts (or other states where the workers don’t actually live or work). [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
Fourth, United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
" Student accepts internship at ExxonMobil, believing (erroneously) that he had the permanent authorization to work in the United States that ExxonMobil required for the job. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
Biden v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 2:06 pm
“Subsidizing needy tenants,” they write, “is a public good that should be paid for with public funds. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
Reducing Industrial Accidents Industrial accidents have long caused carnage in the United States.[2] Generally employers can enhance their employees’ safety in two distinct non-exclusive ways. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 9:52 am
” In Groff, a postal carrier who was unwilling to work on Sundays because of his religious practices sued his employer (the United States Postal Service), alleging that it could have accommodated his Sunday Sabbath without undue hardship. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:39 am
Lifestyle Equities C.V. and another v Ahmed and another, heard 20th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March 2023 Secretary of State for Transport v Curzon Park… [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:30 am
Susan V. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Further, the Appellate Division opined that "[r]easonable defensive measures do not violate the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII, even though such steps are adverse to the charging employee and result in differential treatment", citing United States v New York City Tr. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Further, the Appellate Division opined that "[r]easonable defensive measures do not violate the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII, even though such steps are adverse to the charging employee and result in differential treatment", citing United States v New York City Tr. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:44 am
R (on the application of Toraane and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 23. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
NAACP v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 11:20 am
[x] In United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 2:59 pm
[x] In United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:59 pm
Kitty Block is CEO of the Humane Society of the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:55 am
§247d), the Secretary, HHS, determined that a public health emergency (PHE) exists for the United States.[4] February 4, 2020 – Secretary, HHS Declared that a Public Health Emergency Exists Under the FD&C Act: Under Section 564(b)(1)(C) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) determined that there was a public health emergency that had a significant… [read post]
