Search for: "United States of America v. Articles of Drug"
Results 161 - 180
of 398
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2015, 8:41 am
But it's true nevertheless that when prisoners are kept off the street, they can attack only one another, not you or your family.Imprisonment's crime-reduction effect helps explain why the burglary, car-theft, and robbery rates are lower in the United States than in England. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm
Texas (2003), United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:03 am
Hill was a member of the bargaining unit covered by the CBA. [read post]
21 May 2012, 9:43 am
In the lawsuit titled United States of America v. 434 Main Street, Tewksbury, Massachusetts, the government is suing an inanimate object, the motel Caswell’s father built in 1955. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 5:54 pm
Lopez (1995), United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:03 pm
That new practice received an enthusiastic endorsement when the Ninth Circuit handed down its initial en banc opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am
Wong, 13-1074, and United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 12:00 am
In the United States we call the units dollars; the Germans have marks, the Chinese use renminbis. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:00 pm
In the United States we call the units dollars; the Germans have marks, the Chinese use renminbis. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 6:52 pm
We believe that a trade agreement, drafted correctly, would benefit the United States on the one hand, and the countries of Central America and the Dominican Republic, on the other. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:52 pm
See United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
United States 14-1145Issue: Whether, under Holland v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 10:52 am
Its “customers” are other elements of the United States government that rely on its surveillance. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court absolutely got it right in Employment Div. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
Brown (1943); and (2) whether a binding agreement among multiple states, with both intra- and interstate effects, violates the Compact Clause, Article I, § 10, cl. 3 of the United States Constitution, in the absence of congressional approval.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (5th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition (forthcoming)Amicus brief of Freedom Holdings et al.Reply brief for the petitioners Title: Lay v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 5:16 am
Still the Budapest Convention has been adopted by 68 states, including 23 that are not in the Council of Europe (including the United States). [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 7:03 pm
For instance, in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 10:30 pm
Crommelin, an Oliver Hazard Perry-class guided missile frigate of the United States Navy, [22] has seen its share of these regulatory stops in South America and elsewhere. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm
” In addition, if more states enact fair access laws, financial institutions may be required to comply with an increasing number of fair access laws that may be inconsistent from state to state. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 10:51 am
The respondents in the case are Muslim men who lawfully immigrated to the United States. [read post]
