Search for: "United States of America v. Property et al"
Results 161 - 180
of 387
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2022, 4:57 am
Oracle America Inc. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
United StatesDocket: 10-516Issue(s): Whether an essential element to be proven for a conviction for the offense of bribery of a state or local official under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 10:33 am
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition (forthcoming)Amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al.Amicus brief of New England Legal FoundationAmicus brief of Alliance of Automobile Manufcturers, Inc. et al. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
United States of America, et al. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
United States of America, et al. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IPKat) United States US General Sen Gregg withdraws from nomination to be next Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Influx of Big Content lawyers at Department of Justice: cause for concern? [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
INVENTIO AG et al. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
The Permanent Mission of India to the United NationsDocket: 10-627Issue(s): 1) Whether, in determining whether Congress authorized the Secretary of State ("Secretary") to preempt traditional state taxing powers by designating certain exemptions from state and local property tax laws under The Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
BMW North America, LLC, et. al. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:36 am
Policy et al., A Patent System for the 21st Century (Stephen A. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(IP finance) Withdrawing patent applications – a matter of priority (IPKat) United States US General U.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
ECORE International Inc., et al. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
ECORE International Inc., et al. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 8:51 am
Robert Pepper et al. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
” Brief that makes this argument: The United States, filed in support of vacatur. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
Most judges understand this distinction intuitively because they learned as 1Ls that the Constitution only restricts state action, not private action. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
Gonzalez et al., CV 04-2614 (S.D. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 1:22 pm
Case scheduled Sep 11, 2013 10:00 a.m. in United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Howard T. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
Here is Think IP Strategy’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
