Search for: "United States v. American Natural Gas Company" Results 161 - 180 of 264
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2024, 12:44 pm by Guest Author
” (695) New Zealand’s Court of Appeal has adopted the same basic rule in Bulk Gas Users Group v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
Between the years 1973 and 2011, one hundred of nearly 2,000 Salmonella outbreaks in the United States were traced back to beef, leading to 3,684 illnesses.[1] Salmonella is omnipresent in feedlot cattle. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
Paul, United States Magistrate Judge Jeanne Graham fined the company $100,000 and ordered it to make a $50,000 community service payment to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to benefit the Rice Creek Watershed. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 8:19 am by Eric Goldman
That’s a real thing one company is offering in the United Kingdom. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
– Susan Montoya Bryan, The Associated Press, April 27, 2010 The Bureau of Land Management and conservation groups have settled an eight-year dispute over a management plan for nearly 10,000 natural gas wells in the San Juan Basin of northwestern New Mexico. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Christopher Joyce, National Public Radio, December 7, 2009 The United States has all the tools it needs to replace its old coal energy economy and drastically cut greenhouse emissions. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Milwaukeeans had to wait until December 12 to learn that the United States Supreme Court had denied the state’s petition for certiorari. [read post]
16 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm by renholding
If the influence of Elon Musk and the big oil and gas companies has taught us anything, it is that one cannot depend on an independent political system to check business operations, at least not in the United States after the ironically named Citizens United case and its progeny.[28] Consider also the decades-long failure of international governance regimes to regulate the climate problem effectively. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
" (3)However, some nations such as the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) have at points sought to make methods of execution less liable to bungling or to inflicting gratuitous suffering. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:15 am
Roaring Toyz (Copyright Litigation Blog)   US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC affirms TTAB ruling in ML skin care products case: In re Mighty Leaf Tea (precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CGL, finding transportation of natural gas related to freight forwarding: In re SeaOne Maritime Corp. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 1:35 pm by WIMS
EPA Administrator, Senator Inhofe and representatives from: Attorney General State of Texas; National Black Chamber of Commerce; The Timberland Company; Santee Cooper; Lions Oil Company; Troutman Sanders LLP; American Public Health Association; California Air Resources Board; US Steel Corporation; Illinois Farm Bureau; FMC Corporation; Nucor Corporation; and the American Council for Capital Formation. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
The wreck ruptured a car carrying chlorine gas, releasing a poisonous cloud over the town. [read post]
The rule would also require companies to disclose contextual information, assumptions, and inputs used to calculate each of these metrics.[9] Greenhouse Gas Emissions The proposal would require all registrants to disclose Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:08 am by Ronald Collins
Jaffe’s statement well describes one of the signature accomplishments of modern environmental law in the United States: the use of citizen suits to guard against any shortfalls in the work of administrative agencies charged with administering the nation’s environmental protection laws. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
A federal inspection of the company’s Jesse Hunton Viola Unit, an oil field production facility in Pontotoc County, Oklahoma, on November 9, 2009, found the facility’s SPCC plan did not meet federal requirements, was not certified by a professional engineer, was not approved by the company’s management and did not designate the person accountable for spill prevention. [read post]