Search for: "United States v. Balde" Results 161 - 177 of 177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rodriguez-Amaya, No. 06-4514 Conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation by an aggravated felon is affirmed where the time defendant was detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on administrative charges pending his removal was not detention "in connection with" his arrest, thus defendant's indictment did not violate the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 12:54 am
District Court to one count of conspiring to bribe a state judge. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 11:20 pm
Yesterday the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 5:20 pm
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive Guide for individuals with cerebral palsy and their families. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 10:44 am
 In its order, the court commented: “The Supreme Court of the United States has not yet indicated that, in cases in this posture, all executions by lethal injection should be stayed. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 11:15 am
Compare Appellant's Brief at 2-29 with United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:35 am
Unlike many of us living "free," they have nothing to lose-jobsor social standing-by telling the bald truth. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 1:45 am
Department of Justice in its appeal to the 10th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2006, 2:43 pm
They contend that conclusory allegations cannot simply be ignored, as suggested by petitioners and the United States, because the distinction between factual allegations and conclusions of the pleader was previously rejected by the Court in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2006, 3:27 pm
On Wednesday, federal prosecutors filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. 10th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2003, 4:39 pm
[JURIST] The US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Friday that requiring a permit for obtaining bald eagle parts pursuant to a federal statute was minimally intrusive and not injurious to the religious freedom of a Canadian Indian band member trading in the United States. [read post]