Search for: "United States v. Blackman" Results 161 - 180 of 585
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2022, 9:25 am by Josh Blackman
Accordingly, we held—without qualification—that "the powers delegated to Congress under Article I of the United States Constitution do not include the power to subject nonconsenting States to private suits for damages in state courts. [read post]
22 Feb 2025, 6:07 pm by Josh Blackman
United States held that Congress cannot compel state legislatures to enact legislation. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 2:20 pm by NCC Staff
Josh Blackman is an Associate Professor of Law at the South Texas College of Law in Houston who specializes in constitutional law, the United States Supreme Court, and the intersection of law and technology. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 6:13 pm by Josh Blackman
Generally, the only route of appeal from a state court of last resort is to the United States Supreme Court through certiorari. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 7:35 pm by Josh Blackman
Calabresi now agrees with Tillman that the President is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm by Josh Blackman
We cite the corpus linguistics amicus brief written by James Heilpern in Lucia v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 12:07 pm by Howard Friedman
Pohlman, 'Churches' in a Time of Coronavirus,  (Canopy Forum, 2020).Josh Blackman, What Rights are “Essential”? [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am by Marty Lederman
Within days, every important state boxing commission in the nation had followed suit, effectively preventing Ali from fighting in the United States. [read post]
16 May 2022, 7:27 am by Josh Blackman
["Congress has comprehensively detailed the rules by which noncitizens may enter and live in the United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 6:53 am by Adam Chandler
Plans for a legislative response to the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:45 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, holding that an individual indicted for violating a federal law has standing to raise federalism-based challenges to the relevant statute. [read post]