Search for: "United States v. Canales"
Results 161 - 180
of 317
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2013, 4:10 pm
ECUSA's strategy is geared toward getting an appropriate case into the United States Supreme Court, in its own good time. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 9:23 pm
Edison Co. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:18 pm
Last week, the Utah Supreme Court issued its opinion in Delta Canal Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:19 am
Brooks stated that he has "no idea" whether the Supreme Court will take on Prince v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:22 am
[If you want some handy tips on how to speed-read all those comments, try the Wired How-To Wiki, here] In case you missed it, Eli Lilly and Company v Human Genome Sciences, Inc UKSC 2012/0220 is not going on appeal to the United Kingdom's Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
Earle, 38 U.S. 519 (1839) and Paul v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:16 am
State v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:37 am
But there may be few more fascinating, and regularly shifting, areas of judicial juggling than that of the application of the doctrine of fair use under United States copyright law. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:45 am
So while Cariou v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 6:00 am
An en banc decision of the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has vastly amended the scope of the situs requirement under the LHWCA. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 6:59 am
On Thursday, April 25, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit overturned the 2011 District Court decision, holding that contemporary artist Richard Prince's appropriation of 30 photographs from Patrick Cariou's book "Yes Rasta" for his own "Canal Zone" series was [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 1:13 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 7:55 am
The style of the case is, Canal Indemnity Company v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 12:25 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm
In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is 'no.' [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:14 pm
In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is 'no.' [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 3:56 pm
Earlier this month a United Kingdom court took their turn on stage in the world-wide Apple v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 2:54 pm
Canales, 574 F.3d 1169 (9th Cir. 2009), and United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 1:09 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:07 pm
The summary at the opinion’s outset says it simply: “In this appeal, we address whether the renewal of forty-one water supply contracts by the United States Bureau of Reclamation violates § 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. [read post]
