Search for: "United States v. City and County of San Francisco" Results 161 - 180 of 379
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2018, 9:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Ill.) may yield an answer -- unless the housing authority changes its policy, as San Francisco and Warren County (Illinois) had done. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:19 pm by Arthur F. Coon
On a related note, as part of a panel including Jeannie Lee, AICP, Senior Counsel at OPR, I will be discussing some highlights of the proposed CEQA Guidelines at CLE’s 13th Annual Superconference next Thursday, December 14, 2017 at 11:15 a.m., at the Marriott Marquis in San Francisco. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 10:45 am by Guest Author
County of San Bernardino, the Fourth District Court of Appeal addressed whether paid administrative leave could constitute an adverse employment action. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 10:49 am by Scott Bomboy
 The city joins the state of California, and two other cities, Chicago and San Francisco, that are taking their arguments about the policies to federal court. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 3:33 am by NCC Staff
The lawsuits stem from Trump sanctuary cities policies that started with an executive order in January that was later enjoined in County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am by Chris Winkelman and Philip Gordon
In the dark recesses of single-origin-coffee shops, natural grocery stores, microbreweries and free-range-egg-and-eight-dollar-mimosa brunches in places as far flung as San Francisco, Brooklyn and Washington, D.C., people are coming to a profound, and to them, disturbing revelation: The United States is a republic. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:07 am by Garen Dodge and Daniel Masakayan*
In addition, 15 localities—Austin, Baltimore, Buffalo, Chicago, Columbia (MO), the District of Columbia, Los Angeles, Montgomery County (MD), New York City, Philadelphia, Portland (OR), Prince George’s County (MD), Rochester, San Francisco, and Seattle—have also extended their state’s “Ban the Box” laws to private employers. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:07 am by Garen Dodge and Daniel Masakayan*
In addition, 15 localities—Austin, Baltimore, Buffalo, Chicago, Columbia (MO), the District of Columbia, Los Angeles, Montgomery County (MD), New York City, Philadelphia, Portland (OR), Prince George’s County (MD), Rochester, San Francisco, and Seattle—have also extended their state’s “Ban the Box” laws to private employers. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:27 am by Garen Dodge and Daniel Masakayan*
In addition, 15 localities—Austin, Baltimore, Buffalo, Chicago, Columbia (MO), the District of Columbia, Los Angeles, Montgomery County (MD), New York City, Philadelphia, Portland (OR), Prince George’s County (MD), Rochester, San Francisco, and Seattle—have also extended their state’s “Ban the Box” laws to private employers. [read post]
26 May 2017, 3:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
City & County of S.F.: Plaintiffs Oxane “Gypsy” Taub and George Davis …, self-described body freedom advocates, appeal the dismissal of their claims … against the City and County of San Francisco and the San Francisco Police Department … Plaintiffs allege that Defendants violated their First Amendment rights by enforcing San Francisco’s public nudity ordinance. 1. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 8:45 am by Russell Spivak
Following up on a campaign pledge to end “sanctuary cities” as part of his immigration policy, President Donald Trump issued Executive Order 13768, Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:10 pm by David Urban
City of San Francisco that if an employee is “a policymaker, then . . . his government employment could be terminated for purely political reasons without offending the First Amendment. [read post]