Search for: "United States v. Duffy" Results 161 - 166 of 166
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2007, 1:31 am
  Surely, it will be argued, the United States is TRIPS-compliant as the leading proponent and creator of the TRIPS; hence, if eBay is the law of the United States, it presents a model of TRIPS-compliance for any country to follow. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 11:22 am
In support of the molecular argument, a group of professors led by professors Lemley (Stanford) and Duffy (GWU), looked appropriately at the language of 271(f): [A]s a matter of grammar that the phrase “such components” refers back to the components that have been “supplied” from United States. [read post]
29 Aug 2006, 12:10 pm
In the United States, a subjective approach to judging patentability is now precluded by the last sentence of § 103(a). [read post]