Search for: "United States v. Flood Building"
Results 161 - 180
of 239
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2012, 9:30 am
United States, 264 U.S. 146 (1924). [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 10:39 pm
You didn't build that, after all. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
§ 4012a(b)(1) (2006), states that any lending officer or agency shall not approve any financial assistance for acquisition or construction purposes in any area that has been deemed as having special flood hazards, unless the building is covered by flood insurance. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:04 am
Witkowski v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:00 am
EPA and American Electric Power v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:18 pm
Casenotes: state. [read post]
9 May 2012, 9:28 am
United Kingdom). [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:27 am
United States, 2011 WL 688739 (S.D. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:00 pm
Before the ACA, Congress has not been able to compel Americans to engage in an activity, even one with substantial economic consequences-for example, no one is required by law to purchase flood insurance even if they live in a flood plain or for that matter stop building homes in flood plains. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:51 am
The Court also criticised the fact that residential units had been built within the boundaries of the flood plain and that construction occurred even after the 2001 flood. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 6:11 am
As the 11th Circuit pointed out, Congress never has required homeowners to purchase flood insurance as a condition of building a house in a flood plain, even though the Constitution clearly would allow for that and even though taxpayers end up footing the bill for flood relief. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 1:55 pm
Seek Lawful Nonimmigrant Status without leaving the United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 4:25 pm
Cage testified that when he told John Tuma the lab had flooded Mr. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:19 pm
As we all know by now, after the 2010 Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
The group’s e-petition calls on the Ministry of Justice to “leave FoI alone”, stating, “the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOI) has exposed the scandal of MPs’ expenses, and many examples of waste and improper behaviour by public authorities, politicians and public officials. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
But most recently, the Supreme Court of the United States has halted the massive job discrimination lawsuit against mega-retailer Wal-Mart Stores Inc., stating that the Plaintiffs had not shown justification for the sweeping class-action status. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Room A130, College Building, City University London [please note room change]. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
At the San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz discusses United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
At the San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz discusses United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:46 am
Concepcion and Walmart v. [read post]
