Search for: "United States v. Garrett"
Results 161 - 180
of 286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2010, 5:06 am
The federal judge to whom the case was assigned began his analysis of this issue by noting that a “challenge to a statute on First Amendment grounds requires that I first consider whether the speech . . . is protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:21 am
CACI International and Titan Corp., which considers whether private contractors working overseas for the military can be liable for torture committed at Abu Ghraib – the Court invited the Acting Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:10 am
In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps surveys the eight immigration cases awaiting decision at the court, observing that “history may record this term as a blockbuster in one area that has become eerily relevant to America in 2017: how much due process is owed to immigrants, undocumented aliens, aliens outside the United States—and even naturalized citizens. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:48 am
” Briefly: At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps suggests that Herrera v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am
United States, in which the Court will hear oral arguments tomorrow. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 6:39 am
Notable exceptions were Boumediene and Citizens United, which both contravened public opinion. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 11:04 am
Although the taxing power may not be used to impose “punishment for an unlawful act,” United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 7:39 pm
Garrett, and Todd P. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 7:39 pm
Garrett, and Todd P. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook, was “something of an anticlimax. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 6:52 am
For The Atlantic, Garrett Epps explains why the “whole travel-ban episode,” now on the justices’ merits docket as Trump v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 1:10 pm
United States (1993), The Federalist Papers, and a Justice Department memo prove that not allowing witnesses in an impeachment trial would be unconstitutional. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 1:54 am
United States, in which the court affirmed a lower-court judgment finding that Congress properly delegated authority to the U.S. attorney general to apply the registration requirements of a sex-offender-registration law, “may presage a coming sea change in judicial review of agency rules implementing broad Congressional directives. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:39 am
Finally, Monday’s grant of certiorari in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 3:47 am
United States and the possibility that “overcriminalization actually increases the commission of criminal acts, particularly by white-collar offenders. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and others highlight the amicus brief the Institute has filed in United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps argues that the case, along with Jennings v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 3:48 am
According to estimates published in a joint statement by the United States, Korea, and Japan, the North Korean regime “stole up to $1.7 billion in cryptocurrency in 2022 alone. [read post]
