Search for: "United States v. Handy"
Results 161 - 180
of 193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2009, 6:24 pm
Video 3: Turner v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 9:38 am
United States, 85 Fed. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 9:00 pm
(Federal public defenders apparently already are paid on par with Assistant United States Attorneys.) [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 9:13 pm
In Spears v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 5:14 am
Once again the state-law parallel is elusive. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 5:04 am
In light of the Supreme Court's rulings in Gall and Kimbrough, which had come down in the interim, the majority held in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 7:20 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 12:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 8:15 am
Slovik v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 7:18 am
Especially since like most contracts, there is a strong likelihood that if you end up litigating a Creative Commons brand license in the United States it will be enforced. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 4:15 am
In an important and lengthy new opinion, United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 5:33 pm
Reassuringly it affirms that Creative Commons is not an anti-copyright device but a provider of handy guidance to would-be users, and it doesn't threaten readers with Moorhouse v University of New South Wales, choosing to explain the legal position instead. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 11:03 pm
New York Supreme Court: Smith v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:53 pm
It might come in handy. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:23 am
See United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 7:04 am
United States, 2005 WL 6115381 (Ct. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 5:35 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 5:48 am
The United States has likewise confronted the issue of linguistic rights, as exemplified by the 1923 U.S. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:07 am
Interesting case out of the United States District Court for the District of Maine the other day, concerning a challenge by a plan participant to how his long term disability payments were calculated. [read post]
