Search for: "United States v. Humphrey"
Results 161 - 180
of 262
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2022, 6:00 am
United States. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court case, Christie v. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 7:03 pm
In Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 9:50 am
Okaloosa County School District, United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
United States and Humphrey's Executor v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 1:46 pm
The Sygma Network, Inc., United States District Court, M.D. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 11:14 am
Therefore, the well is a facility "from which oil or a hazardous substance was discharged""into or upon the navigable waters of the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 2:32 pm
In the landmark case of Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 11:02 am
You shouldn’t have the freedom to abuse people like that in the United States, no matter where you live. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 7:57 am
United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935), and Morrison v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:01 am
The current economic situation in the United States is recognized on all sides to be grim, and not getting better any time soon. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:12 pm
Both parties, and the United States as an amicus, agreed in this case that these provisions allow courts the ability to dismiss such suits without prejudice. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 5:54 am
In Tinker v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:52 am
Biden, the Court upheld Roger Severino’s removal from the Council that supervises the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS). [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 2:37 pm
The next case is McDonald v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 2:37 pm
United States. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
" Oil States Energy Servs. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 7:49 am
United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935), and explicitly distinguished its more recent holding on the President’s removal power as to single-head agencies therefrom, Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:43 am
Respondents' Argument US Solicitor General Elena Kagan argued the case for the United States, which previously intervened in the case. [read post]
