Search for: "United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission" Results 161 - 180 of 318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2016, 5:43 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
The most well-known case brought under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, to date, has been United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
However, five justices did agree that Congress could not use the Interstate Commerce Power to regulate non-acts, omissions. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:38 am by Jim Rossi
Section 1(b) of the NGA gives FERC jurisdiction to regulate: (1) transportation of natural gas in interstate commerce; (2) natural gas sales in interstate commerce for resale (i.e., wholesale sales); and (3) natural gas companies engaged in such transportation or sale. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 6:25 pm by Mark Latham
Under her approach, Congress enacted the NGA by reliance on its power to regulate interstate commerce, and “we have repeatedly held that the Commerce Clause does not strip the States of their sovereign immunity. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:04 am by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/39027-2.10.doc.pdf Federal Law United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 8:17 am by Robert M. Horwitz and Kyle M. Asher
On June 12, 2017, the United States Supreme Court held that a buyer of defaulted consumer debt was not subject to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”). [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 8:17 am by Robert M. Horwitz and Kyle M. Asher
On June 12, 2017, the United States Supreme Court held that a buyer of defaulted consumer debt was not subject to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”). [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 11:01 pm by Jarod Bona
Toys “R” Us sold about twenty-percent of the toys in the United States and in some metropolitan areas, it sold up to almost half of the toys. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 11:01 pm by Jarod Bona
Toys “R” Us sold about twenty-percent of the toys in the United States and in some metropolitan areas, it sold up to almost half of the toys. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
District Court for the Southern District of Florida indicted Rutgerson with one count of:`using any facility and means of interstate commerce, [to] knowingly attempt to persuade, induce, entice, and coerce an individual who had not attained the age of eighteen years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which a person can be charged with a criminal offense, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422(b). [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:32 am by Nabiha Syed
In Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:51 am by John Elwood
Garza, 17-654 Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 6:44 am
Supreme court case of Caulder -v- Bull 3 U.S. 386 (1798) which states:"I will state what laws I consider ex post facto laws, within the words and the intent of the prohibition. 1st. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 10:38 am by Charlotte Garden
… The term also means (1) any agent of such a person, and (2) a State or political subdivision of a State and any agency or instrumentality of a State or a political subdivision of a State, and any interstate agency, but such term does not include the United States. [read post]