Search for: "United States v. Jesse" Results 161 - 180 of 645
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2010, 7:45 am by Nabiha Syed
Jess Bravin of WSJ Law Blog delves into the effect of Citizens United on state campaign laws, focusing on corporate electioneering in Montana. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court reaffirmed precedent holding that prosecution of the same conduct by separate sovereigns, such as a state and the federal government, does not violate the Constitution’s double jeopardy clause. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which involves the scope of the prosecution’s duty to disclose exculpatory evidence under the Brady rule. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 7:50 pm by cdw
” [via Tim Cone @ Defense Newsletter Blog]   Other United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Paul Ramirez (NU)• Evelyn Atkinson (University of Chicago), "The Right to Bodily Integrity: Pratt v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 8:33 am
Elizabeth Prelogar, Solicitor General of the United States Hon. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:13 am
(David Gray/Reuters) So held federal District Judge Jesse Furman in Manhattan in yesterday’s Zhang v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 7:21 am by Ross Davies
Langbein, The Disappearance of Civil Trial in the United States, 122 Yale Law Journal 522 (2012) • Diane P. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks how fully a judge must explain a sentencing modification. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 9:22 am by CJLF Staff
SCOTUS Hears Travel Ban Case Wednesday:  The Supreme Court will hear argument in the Ninth Circuit case of Trump v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 5:35 am by Amy Howe
United States, the Court limited the availability of enhanced sentences for drug dealers whose customers die or suffer serious injuries. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 10:04 am by Anna Christensen
United States, the Court asked the Fourth Circuit to reconsider in the context of United States v. [read post]