Search for: "United States v. John Lawrence" Results 161 - 180 of 499
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am by Andrew Hamm
United States) “The Boldest Moves: When and How to Make Them” (focusing on the power grab in Bush v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
The most high-profile grant was in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant before acquiring cell-site-location information from wireless carriers, that “question the factual and legal assumptions of the pro-Carpenter briefs. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a guilty plea waives a challenge to the constitutionality of an offense. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm by Wolfgang Demino
BURGE, SESSIONS FISHMAN NATHAN & ISRAEL & MICHAEL MESSERSCHMIDT, PRETI, FLAHERTY, BELIVEAU, & PACHIOS, LLP.US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Defendant, represented by JOHN J. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:37 am by Bill Marler
E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes E. coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body, as well as on the tail, or flagellum,[2] and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and animals.[4] The E. coli bacterium is among the most extensively studied… [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:03 am by Ronald Collins
Eminent Supreme Court scholar Lawrence Baum argues that the links between ideology and issues are not simply a matter [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court upheld the convictions of the defendants in a notorious murder trial over a claim that evidence had been suppressed in violation of Brady v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:51 pm by David Markus
Last week, the Supreme Court gave permanent resident Jae Lee, a second chance to stay in the United States after bad advice from his lawyer led him to plead guilty, leading to Lee's deportation. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:51 pm by David Markus
Last week, the Supreme Court gave permanent resident Jae Lee, a second chance to stay in the United States after bad advice from his lawyer led him to plead guilty, leading to Lee's deportation. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm by Dan Ernst
—Humberto Morales Moreno, Universidad Autonoma de Puebla  Author Meets Reader: Carol Steiker & Jordan Steiker, Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital PunishmentTue, 6/20: 12:45 PM  - 2:30 PM – Sheraton Maria Isabel Imperio C (2nd Floor) ·         Authors—Carol Steiker, Harvard Law School and Jordan Steiker, University of Texas School of Law   ·        … [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
  As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:45 am by Barbara Moreno
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Johnson, Timothy Russell, Oral Arguments and Decision Making on the United States Supreme Court (2004). [read post]
3 May 2017, 2:30 am by Nicandro Iannacci
One major argument is the corporate critique, powerfully articulated by Justice John Paul Stevens in his lengthy dissent to the Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
At Reuters, Lawrence Hurley reports that during Wednesday’s argument in Maslenjak v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm by Morgan Weiland
Chafee, Zechariah, Freedom of Speech in War Time (1919). ______________, Free Speech in the United States (1941). [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court held that a trial court can consider mandatory minimums for possessing firearms when sentencing a defendant for an underlying drug offense, observing that because “Dean seems to me to be a substantive ruling that applies retroactively,” there will likely “be many more than just a handful of ‘Dean resentencing’ efforts. [read post]