Search for: "United States v. Kevin Herring"
Results 161 - 180
of 454
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2023, 4:15 pm
United States, Dred Scott v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 8:12 am
Hejran is staff counsel at Americans United for Life, which filed an amicus brief on behalf of 207 members of Congress in support of the respondent in June Medical Services v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 6:15 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Just in May 2011, Sun Life was hit with two complaints from disability insurance benefits claimants, one in the United States District Court District of New Jersey (Kevin Giblin v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 11:14 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 7:36 am
L v. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 7:16 am
Let’s start with United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:43 am
United States, in which the Court held that a Pennsylvania woman who attempted to poison her husband’s mistress could not be prosecuted in federal court. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:16 am
United States Postal Service, which asks whether the federal government can challenge patents under the America Invents Act, comes from Ronald Mann. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:42 am
Perry; the firm’s Kevin Russell was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am
United States, which asks whether stock options are taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act, and Chavez-Meza v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
United States, 17-7177 Issue: Whether, when a criminal defendant has already been convicted of an offense in a state criminal proceeding, the United States may thereafter prosecute the defendant for the same offense without violating the Fifth Amendment’s prohibition on double jeopardy. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:08 am
See Swann v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 6:20 am
United States, a challenge to the ban on direct corporate campaign spending in the Federal Campaign Finance Act, and McCutcheon v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 12:00 am
The case of United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 4:46 am
" Additionally, Goodyear points out that the limitations period was not at issue in Bazemore because claims brought by the United States were not subject to section 706(e). [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 3:23 am
United States, __ A.3d __ (D.C. 2012), an opinion it issued last week on prior consistent statements. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 4:07 am
New Mexico, an original-jurisdiction case in which a unanimous court held that the United States can pursue claims against New Mexico for violation of the Rio Grande water compact. [read post]
