Search for: "United States v. Ley"
Results 161 - 173
of 173
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2009, 3:05 am
In Lei Shi v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 3:32 pm
Standard of ReviewTrial courts have always been afforded broad discretion in the granting of new trials, and may exercise such discretion “in the interests of justice and fairness” without stating any other reason. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 6:06 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
The United States as intervenor and amicus supports the position of the Holy See with respect to the Holy See's status as a foreign state and the constitutionality of the FSIA. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 5:08 pm
Or, more accurately, does the United States, in particular, have jurisdiction to punish pirates for offenses committed on the high seas? [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 5:46 pm
Thirteen other research libraries in the United States listed in the OCLC Worldcat indicate that they hold copies of the Alvarez book, so I have requested a copy through my library’s interlibrary loan service. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:59 am
Esa "selección" es a veces precisamente la causa-fin del contrato, como notoriamente ocurre con los que asisten a sitios de "solos y solas".Y estas cláusulas tácitas, válidas como todo ejercicio de la libertad de contratación, serán nulas sólo en la medida en que aquel compromiso sea… [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 3:21 am
United States, 2007 U.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 3:37 am
United States" 294 U.S. 330 y "U.S. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2006, 6:26 am
Gozarán de una retribución que se fijará por ley y no podrá ser disminuida mientras permanezcan en funciones. [read post]
14 Dec 2005, 3:40 pm
United States", 383 U.S. 541, 1966)".Hay otras cosas interesantes que dice la Corte sobre derecho penal, en las que trasciende el tema puntual de la punición a menores.El concepto de peligrosidad: "no corresponde a la competencia de esta Corte interpretar el alcance especÃfico de la expresión "peligrosidad" contenida en el art. 41 del Código Penal. [read post]
22 Oct 2005, 9:18 pm
"United States et al. v. [read post]
