Search for: "United States v. Maine"
Results 161 - 180
of 5,176
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:14 am
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:31 am
Voting is now open! [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 10:40 am
Between 1999 and 2019, nearly a quarter-million people died from overdosing on prescription opioids like OxyContin, outstripping car accidents and gunshots as the leading cause of accidental death in the United States. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:35 pm
Y.B. 50 (2021) 119-145 , introduction below.Pix Credit here Sascha-Dominik Dov BachmannCanberra Law School (Australia)ORCID: 0000-0002-8742-0766e-mail: Sascha.Bachmann@canberra.edu.auAnthony PaphitiFormer officer with the UK Army Legal Services (United Kingdom) Mass Migration as a Hybrid Threat? [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 8:29 am
But the constraints on public prosecutors, which we saw in connection with United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:00 am
However, it was decided by the United States Supreme Court in Enmund v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:00 am
However, it was decided by the United States Supreme Court in Enmund v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
In the 1980 case of Maine v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 1:08 pm
With that as an introduction, here is a brief description of the main challenges property owners can assert against condemning entities: Public Use: The Constitutions of Michigan and the United States allow government-authorized entities to condemn property for “public use. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 7:27 am
The Article I Nondelegation Doctrine The main giver-based nondelegation doctrine is the classic Nondelegation Doctrine stemming from Article I's Vesting Clause—"[a]ll legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States"—which holds that Congress can't give up legislative power. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:56 am
-based Economic Intelligence Unit (EIU) indicate these elections were highly questionable. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am
United States, 412 U.S. 521 (1973) Carlson v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 3:35 pm
United Tape & Finishing Co., et al., No. 21 C 3400, 2023 WL 5228178, at *3 (N.D. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
Vidal v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 6:08 pm
At the same time, critics of the administrative state have called into question authority of administrative agencies to adjudicate claims in light of Article III’s command that “[t]he judicial power of the United States shall be vested” in courts. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:58 am
United States and Jackson v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:37 am
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:07 am
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
