Search for: "United States v. Means" Results 161 - 180 of 29,641
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2024, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
  Lab-cultivated products have won approval from the FDA and USDA in the United States, but some are waiting for a tougher review by EFSA. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
State deficiencies in climate litigations and actions of judges Laurent Fonbaustier / Renaud Braillet  165   Part IV: Cities, States and Climate Change: Between Competition, Conflict and Cooperation Global climate governance turning translocal Delphine Misonne 181   America’s Climate Change Policy: Federalism in Action Daniel Esty  193    Local policies on climate change in a centralized State: The Example of France Camille… [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:42 pm
(Fn. 2: Moab and the United States spill much ink fighting the question presented, insisting that this case is about half-truths rather than pure omissions. [read post]
13 May 2024, 1:59 pm by Scott Bomboy
., filed a petition in the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:55 am by Charles Sartain
In Citizens for Clean Air & Clean Water in Brazoria County et al v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” In addition, if more states enact fair access laws, financial institutions may be required to comply with an increasing number of fair access laws that may be inconsistent from state to state. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:42 am by Richard Hunt
The ADA was not intended to create equality by bringing everyone down to the same low level of participation in the economic and social life of the United States. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:55 am by Dennis Crouch
The Supreme Court is currently considering the meaning of “accrues” in the context of suing the United States government in Corner Post, Inc. v. [read post]