Search for: "United States v. Ortiz"
Results 161 - 180
of 305
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2009, 9:10 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 7:54 am
United States and Ortiz v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 11:07 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 6:20 pm
Montoya-Ortiz, 7 F.3d 1171, 1181-82 (5th Cir. 1993); United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:00 am
Ortiz. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 1:18 pm
Nov. 26, 2014), now join Ortiz v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 11:47 am
United States, Maurer identified an argument that the parties, the amici, and the court did not make. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:23 am
United States, Assistant to the Solicitor General Ann O’Connell drew that straw. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 7:30 am
” Thus, Langston joined two previous California federal district courts (See Ortiz v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:31 am
Palmore, Assistant to the Solicitor General, who argued on behalf of the United States as an amicus in support of the Borough. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 12:36 pm
” As Wikipedia also explains, “an insular area is a United States territory, that is neither a part of one of the fifty U.S. states nor the District of Columbia”. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:53 am
Other cases scheduled for oral argument this week include Ortiz v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:05 am
The other, Ortiz v. [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 4:08 am
United States. [read post]
2 May 2010, 6:20 am
United States. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 1:39 am
DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Criminal Practice Cocaine, Crack Distribution Conspirator's Sentence Reduced to 240-Month Mandatory Minimum Term United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:00 am
Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company was filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. [read post]
6 Nov 2024, 9:00 am
Here is a copy of the decision in PDF: Domino v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 1:50 pm
The United States Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, which is the federal appellate court governing federal cases arising in the State of Florida, discussed the degree of harassment which is necessary to sustain a claim of a hostile work environment its recent decision in Ortiz v. [read post]
