Search for: "United States v. Patch"
Results 161 - 180
of 285
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2013, 1:54 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Meanwhile end users are slow in acknowledging vulnerabilities, use patches too infrequently, and fail to timely deploy published updates. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 4:10 am
Since the SCOTUS decisions in United States -v- Windsor and Hollingsworth -v- Perry last summer, the civil rights push for same-sex marriage equality has picked-up momentum throughout the country. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 7:12 am
[5] Williams v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 7:12 am
[5] Williams v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 4:15 pm
To apply United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Said and United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 3:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:56 am
See Acme United Corp. v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:00 am
Skin cancer is the most common form of cancer in the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:00 am
Defendant served a Notice of IME stating that “patch testing will be performed applying the subject product in the appropriate proportions. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
Institute of Cetacean Research v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 6:55 am
In an opening statement in this partially split decision, the majority states, "You don't need a peg leg or an eye patch. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 1:41 pm
1-800-411-Pain Referral Service, LLC v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
The FDCA, in turn, defines “drug” as:(A) articles recognized in the official United States Pharmacopœia, official Homœopathic Pharmacopœia of the United States, or official National Formulary, or any supplement to any of them; and (B) articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals; and (C) articles (other than food) intended to affect the structure or… [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:10 am
See Bunney v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 8:56 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
