Search for: "United States v. Potter" Results 161 - 180 of 300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2024, 11:51 pm by Steven Calabresi
United States, so it is hard to be wildly enthusiastic about any of them. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:25 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 6:55 am by Kevin Russell
Arguing for the United States as an amicus supporting Nassar, Melissa Arbus Sherry was immediately confronted by Justice Kennedy’s practical concerns. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 11:00 pm by Kingsley Egbuonu
 The Court of Appeal in the case of Arewa Textiles Plc & Others v. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 9:05 pm by Gina Gkoulgkountina
Two federal district judges issued opposing rulings after considering challenges to the plan of the United States DOGE Service and others (collectively referred to as DOGE) to access agency systems. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
The National Security Communications Unit is said to be dedicated to “combating disinformation by state actors and others. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Milwaukeeans had to wait until December 12 to learn that the United States Supreme Court had denied the state’s petition for certiorari. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Oct. 17, 13 Employment Law: Termination Was the Appellant constructively dismissed.David Potter v. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 10:30 am by Brian Cuban
  Many however, view it as an expression of  hatred towards Americans and the United States as a whole. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 11:35 am by Jon Miller
Wiley won the case with the Second Circuit ruling that the first sale doctrine only applies to goods manufactured in the United States. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
”On March 8, 1971, her lawsuit against the Salvation Army under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was dismissed from the United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
United States (1971) and United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:44 pm by Tobias Thienel
(Wilkinson v Kitzinger [2007] EWHC 2022 (Fam), [2007] UKHRR 164, para 107, per Sir Mark Potter P) I'm not sure this reasoning hol [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 6:29 am by Naomi Shatz
The language of the statute states: “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. [read post]