Search for: "United States v. Ramos" Results 161 - 180 of 252
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2024, 10:24 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Sentiments like these no doubt contributed to the Trump administrations efforts to terminate TPS designations for Haiti, Sudan, Nicaragua, and El Salvador, a decision that was challenged by TPS beneficiaries and their U.S. citizen children in federal court in Ramos v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 11:35 am by Adam Feldman
In another decision this term, Kagan surprised many by joining Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito in dissent in Ramos v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Wade, decided in 1973, is a precedent of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
During her forensic interview, A.S. stated that she attempted to delete some of the pornographic images that she found.Marsh v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 2:29 pm by Amy Howe
The act also requires employees to verify that they are eligible to work in the United States by submitting a Form I-9, and it strictly limits the use of information on or attached to a Form I-9. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:38 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Individuals who arrived in the United States after the continuous residence dates for these designations are not eligible for TPS. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 5:35 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property & Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office “The adults in the room” (direct quote) know you have to pay for patents or you’re going to get sued. [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:53 pm by Margaret Taylor
United States as permitting “Congress to inquire into and publicize corruption, maladministration or inefficiency in agencies of the Government. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: For The New York Times, Timothy Williams reports that a pending ruling in Ramos v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 1:05 pm by Amy Howe
Vannoy (Nov. 30): Whether the Supreme Court’s decision in Ramos v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:22 am by SHG
By 5-4 decision, the Supreme yesterday put an end to consumer class actions in AT&T v. [read post]