Search for: "United States v. Reid"
Results 161 - 180
of 341
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2016, 6:44 pm
People v Reid, 19 N.Y.3d 382, 387-388 (N.Y. 2012). [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 7:15 am
The Nevada Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains State resources compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:53 am
At USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that the case, which will be argued on Wednesday, “could go a long way toward reversing abortion rights in the United States[:] Whether they ultimately revert by four years or 47 remains to be seen. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:51 pm
In Michaels v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 4:30 am
In R. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:13 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 [1923]), held that Ofshe's theories have not gained "general acceptance in the scientific community," and refused to allow him to testify for the defense. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:27 am
This case will be settled by the United States Supreme Court! [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:40 am
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326; Polonetsky v Better Homes Depot, 97 NY2d 46, 54; Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275; Peery v United Capital Corp., 84 AD3d 1201; Sokol v Leader, 74 AD3d 1180, 1180-1181; Reid v Gateway Sherman, Inc., 60 AD3d 836, 837; Roth v Goldman, 254 AD2d 405, 406), the complaint adequately stated a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice by alleging that during its… [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 6:09 pm
If you want to hear Senator Reid’s point of order (“that the vote on cloture under Rule 22 for all nominations other than that for Supreme Court of the United States is by majority vote”) it is at around 1:37:00 in this video. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 12:13 pm
As they later acknowledge, the Supreme Court held in Reid v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 10:01 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
” 15 The remaining “lesser” or “non-core” factors included the amount of skill required for the work, the degree of permanence of the working relationship between the worker and the putative employer, and whether the work is part of an integrated unit of production. 16 The 2021 IC Rule further provided that it was “highly unlikely” that these non-core factors could outweigh the combined probative value of the core factors. 17 The Final Rule rescinds… [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 9:08 pm
In Campbell v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
’” Reid v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 9:53 am
United States, 198 U.S. 45 (1905).To which I can only respond, “huh”? [read post]
10 May 2012, 2:45 am
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d at 326; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87-88; Peery v United Capital Corp., 84 AD3d 1201). [read post]
