Search for: "United States v. Sacks" Results 161 - 180 of 313
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2012, 11:55 am by Kali Borkoski
This morning the Court issued its decision in the GPS tracking case United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 6:21 am by Kiran Bhat
United States, urging the Court to strike Arizona’s controversial immigration law. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:15 am by Conor McEvily
United States, continued to keep Court watchers and commentators busy yesterday. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:26 am by Nabiha Syed
United States, in which the state has asked it to overturn the lower courts’ decisions blocking enforcement of four provisions of its controversial immigration law, S.B. 1070. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 6:25 am by Kiran Bhat
NPR’s Fresh Air discusses United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 6:51 am by Nabiha Syed
United States and Hill v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am by Conor McEvily
”  The Court also heard oral arguments yesterday in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Joshua Matz
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:43 am by Marissa Miller
With the Court set to hear arguments this week in two of the Term’s most anticipated cases – United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:05 am by Kiran Bhat
Jaikumar Vijayan of Computerworld previews Tuesday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:26 am by Conor McEvily
” Finally, Joan Biskupic of the USA Today previews next week’s argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 7:21 am by Conor McEvily
  For this blog’s Academic round-up, Amanda Frost examines some of the academic commentary on the Fourth Amendment’s applicability to GPS surveillance, an issue the Court will take up in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:30 am by Marissa Miller
Finally, at the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr weighs in on the first question presented in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 6:37 am by Nabiha Syed
One of yesterday’s grants was United States v. [read post]