Search for: "United States v. Sellers" Results 161 - 180 of 1,508
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2010, 8:00 am
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) has issued the long-awaited decision in the case 08-964 Bilski et.al. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 3:32 am by Jody Coultas
Case date: 01 April 2019 Case number: No. 17-14211 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
21 May 2018, 2:03 pm by Aaron Rubin
Jones III of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware granted the Trustee-Defendant Wilmington Trust Company’s (“Wilmington Trust”) motion to dismiss in IKB International, S.A. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 12:08 pm
” The decision provides important clarification on the standard laid out by the United States Supreme Court in Morrison v. [read post]
Case date: 14 September 2021 Case number: No. 20-3369 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 9:54 am
  On the merits, the Federal Circuit rejected the contention that because legal title to the products changed in Canada that there was not a "sale" in the United States as contemplated by § 271(a), given that the customer was in the United States and the products were shipped there. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:20 am by Matthias Weller
On 10 July 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rendered its judgment in the matter of Alan Philipps et al. v. the Federal Republic of Germany and the Stiftung Preussischer Kulturbesitz. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:58 am
But some states like New York will look at them under the same test - meaning counsel must tailor them narrowly to protect an employer's business interest. -- Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Opinion Date: 10/1/09 Cite: Cenveo Corp. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 9:25 pm
It is not often that the Second Circuit reverses a drug conspiracy on insufficiency grounds, but it did so in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:22 pm by Submitted Post
States of the United States do not have customs regulations and most states do not have to deal with international security issues in the course of interstate commerce. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 10:41 am by Paul Karlsgodt
”  In simpler terms, if the parties become bound to effectuate the transaction in the United States, the transaction is a domestic one, but the transaction could also be domestic if title to the securities passes within in the United States, even if the parties became bound elsewhere. [read post]