Search for: "United States v. Short"
Results 161 - 180
of 10,042
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
Since the early 1930s – when theorists in the United States began arguing over the corporate objective – legal restrictions and requirements have dramatically limited those choices, largely for the benefit of stakeholders who are not shareholders. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
In short order, the federal courts will have to decide the very questions that Trump v. [read post]
Celanese v. ITC: Can a Secret Manufacturing Process Be Patented After Sale of the Resulting Product?
4 Mar 2024, 9:45 am
Auld Company v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
The text applies to those who hold "civil office under the Authority of the United States. [read post]
The Recalibration of Colonel Brock: D.C. Circuit Ruling for J6 Rioter Could Impact Hundreds of Cases
3 Mar 2024, 4:01 am
Here is the opinion: United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 5:16 pm
First, it is focused quite directly on the law in action, suggesting that the true functional law is Lynch’s rather than that of the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:10 am
In relation to the transfer of Russian assets in particular, the United States has been reported as endorsing countermeasures adopted “by states ‘injured’ and ‘specially affected’ by [the Russian] aggression” against Ukraine. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:06 pm
Skelly Wright (a liberal) made short but “textualist” work of this argument. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
Access Corp. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
No state, let alone the United States, engages in diplomatic relations with the cartels, nor do the cartels purport to maintain diplomatic relations. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
Charter, which enshrines the “sovereign equality” of the United Nations’ members. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am
But bad as we may sincerely, even correctly, believe some of these decisions to be, they are still the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 5:27 pm
As the United States Supreme Court articulated in Dastar Corp. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Post’s new book, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921-1930, is the latest installment of the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
John Mikhail, Georgetown Law, has a post up on Balkinization entitled A Reality Check on "Officers of the United States" at the Founding, in which he draws upon the research he conducted on the phrase in connection with his study of the Necessary and Proper Clause. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Things can be source identifiers, without being commercial source identifiers (United We Stand): confusion but not dilution actionable Jack Daniel’s didn’t purport to decide the full scope of the “noncommercial” exclusion. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm
A short explanation of relists is available here. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
Furthermore, Story would expressly engage in a discussion of the Constitution's "officers of the United States"-language and "office under the United States" three sections later: in Section 791. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:47 pm
United States (1996)), and two came after (United States v. [read post]
