Search for: "United States v. Sotomayor"
Results 161 - 180
of 3,437
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
" Yet Justice Kagan joined Justice Sotomayor's Dubin opinion in full. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
" Justices Barrett, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan signed on to parts of Justice Gorsuch's opinion, providing a majority that let the law stand. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
In 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:47 pm
On July 17, 2023, the California Supreme Court decided an important state law issue raised by the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:18 pm
Norfolk Southern Railway, and United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:40 am
In June 2022, the United States Supreme Court in Viking River v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 5:16 pm
In June 2022, the United States Supreme Court in Viking River v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
Hetronic International Inc., the Supreme Court held that the Lanham Act does not reach trademark infringement that occurs outside of the United States (US). [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
Fourth, United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In Groff v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
United States, 599 U.S. ____ (2023). [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
United States. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:05 am
And, because “not all blacks in the United States were former slaves,” “ ‘freedman’ ” was a decidedly underinclusive proxy for race. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 4:34 am
" Justice Sotomayor explains further: The Supreme Court of the United States declares that a particular kind of business, though open to the public, has a constitutional right to refuse to serve members of a protected class. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:39 am
United States) and June 27, 2023 (Counterman v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:19 am
Sotomayor disagreed, stating that Steele went further than the majority would profess. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:19 am
Sotomayor disagreed, stating that Steele went further than the majority would profess. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
The United States Supreme Court can’t seem to make up its mind about race. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:31 am
United States, the Court’s latest decision regarding the Confrontation Clause and nonconfessing codefendants. [read post]
