Search for: "United States v. Standard Oil Company of California"
Results 161 - 180
of 207
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
The administrative order signed by the company requires it to follow a schedule of clean up agreed to by EPA and the company. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
” Then the other 49 states can adopt standards identical to California’s, or none whatsoever. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
The two companies will also pay a combined $3.3 million civil penalty to the United States as well as to Alabama and Louisiana, and $200,000 to Louisiana organ [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
” Click Here Railroad Company to Pay $4 Million Penalty for 2005 Chlorine Spill in Graniteville, SC. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
This Settlement Agreement proposes to compromise a claim the United States has at this Site for Past Response Costs, as those terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
: Duhn Oil Tool, Inc v Cooper Cameron Corp (not precedential) (Patently-O) CAFC reverses ITC finding of non-infringement of design patent: Crocs, Inc v ITC (Inventive Step) (ITC Law Blog) (Class 99) (IP Frontline) CAFC: Visiting Judge explains potential downfalls of De Novo standard of claim construction review: Trading Techs. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
: Duhn Oil Tool, Inc v Cooper Cameron Corp (not precedential) (Patently-O) CAFC reverses ITC finding of non-infringement of design patent: Crocs, Inc v ITC (Inventive Step) (ITC Law Blog) (Class 99) (IP Frontline) CAFC: Visiting Judge explains potential downfalls of De Novo standard of claim construction review: Trading Techs. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Click Here DECISIONS Roberson Oil Company, Inc. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
“The United States brought this case to protect an important body of water, Pyramid Lake,” said Ignacia S. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm
The plaintiffs aggregation theory is reminiscent of the 1949 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Standard Oil Co. of California v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 8:25 am
They will have to meet state clean car standards in California and at least 13 other states. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
Click Here California Dairy Gives County a Gas Detection System, Settling Case. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
Click Here California Dairy Gives County a Gas Detection System, Settling Case. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
— Imelda V. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
— Christopher Joyce, National Public Radio, December 7, 2009 The United States has all the tools it needs to replace its old coal energy economy and drastically cut greenhouse emissions. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here National Union Fire Insurance Company et al. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:53 am
Originally, it was used as a way to govern relations between nations, but now it is being utilized by human rights activists in order to hold corporations responsible for acts performed by their subsidiaries which infringe upon the rights of people in foreign nations in which the company resides. [1] The Act reads: “The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the… [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
