Search for: "United States v. State of Oregon, et al."
Results 161 - 180
of 180
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2009, 5:11 pm
Sec'y of State for the Home Dep't, with introductory note by Valentina AzarovICSID: Micula et al. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure… [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Sixth Circuit Holds Disabled Retirees Lack Standing to Bring Claims Under Disabilities ActLeroy McKnight, et al. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 12:24 am
Kimbell et al, Civil No. 07-1871-SU,, 2008 WL 4186913 (D.Or. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
United States, ex rel. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
Foods that have been sources of contamination include ground beef, venison, sausages, dried (non-cooked) salami, unpasteurized milk and cheese, unpasteurized apple juice and cider (Cody, et al., 1999), orange juice, alfalfa and radish sprouts (Breuer, et al., 2001), lettuce, spinach, and water (Friedman, et al., 1999). [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 6:10 pm
Fitch et al., No. 03-1223 (U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:53 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:18 pm
Oregon Department of Agriculture, et al. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
United Staffing Alliance Employee Medical Plan, et al. [read post]
23 May 2008, 10:17 pm
Rev. 349 (2005) [hereinafter, “Schwartz, et al. [read post]
7 May 2008, 7:11 am
., et al. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:11 am
Metzger, et al. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
Metzger, et al. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 8:07 am
Pyett, et al. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 8:15 am
The Oregon State Bar, et al. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Nothing in this Act shall apply to any of the following:(1) Actions or transactions specifically authorized by laws administered by any regulatory body or officer acting under statutory authority of this State or the United States.815 Ill. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 8:20 am
Burr et al. , No. 06-84. [read post]
