Search for: "United States v. Tam"
Results 161 - 180
of 916
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2017, 8:40 am
The case involving the REDSKINS mark is currently on hold until the United States Supreme Court decides the In re Tam case. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 11:04 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 6:04 am
However, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals threw out the Eisenstein case, holding that: "...where the United States has declined to intervene in a False Claims action, the United States is not a party to the action...therefore a notice of appeal must be filed in 30 days. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 11:05 pm
In an unpublished July 1 decision in United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 4:44 pm
Granston stressed that in declined cases, the government is a “third party” as described in United States ex rel. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
For this month’s edition of Fast Break , we will be joined by healthcare litigation partners Katie McDermott and Howard Young to analyze the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit's recently affirmed $114 million judgment in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
We examine arguments made by Sigma, Island Industries, and the United States, as the Ninth Circuit grapples with this important question. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
We examine arguments made by Sigma, Island Industries, and the United States, as the Ninth Circuit grapples with this important question. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
We examine arguments made by Sigma, Island Industries, and the United States, as the Ninth Circuit grapples with this important question. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
For this month’s edition of Fast Break , we will be joined by healthcare litigation partners Katie McDermott and Howard Young to analyze the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit's recently affirmed $114 million judgment in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
We examine arguments made by Sigma, Island Industries, and the United States, as the Ninth Circuit grapples with this important question. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 10:00 am
Sheldon v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
We examine arguments made by Sigma, Island Industries, and the United States, as the Ninth Circuit grapples with this important question. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
For this month’s edition of Fast Break , we will be joined by healthcare litigation partners Katie McDermott and Howard Young to analyze the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit's recently affirmed $114 million judgment in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
For this month’s edition of Fast Break , we will be joined by healthcare litigation partners Katie McDermott and Howard Young to analyze the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit's recently affirmed $114 million judgment in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
We examine arguments made by Sigma, Island Industries, and the United States, as the Ninth Circuit grapples with this important question. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
For this month’s edition of Fast Break , we will be joined by healthcare litigation partners Katie McDermott and Howard Young to analyze the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit's recently affirmed $114 million judgment in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
For this month’s edition of Fast Break , we will be joined by healthcare litigation partners Katie McDermott and Howard Young to analyze the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit's recently affirmed $114 million judgment in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 12:17 pm
* * * The United States filed its complaint in a lawsuit filed under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 2:14 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
