Search for: "United States v. Territory of VI"
Results 161 - 180
of 321
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
On 25 February 2015, the Supreme Court handed down its judgments in R (oao Rotherham Metropolitan BC and Ors) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 6. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Team Members: Joseph Fortunato (3L), Sameer Ponkshe (3L) In this year’s competition titled United States v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm
This issue did not need to be decided upon in CG v Facebook Ireland because the DPA was found not to apply. [read post]
14 May 2015, 8:51 pm
National Security Letter Program Reforms Title V of the new House bill reforms the FBI’s national security letter program in similar fashion as the Leahy bill did. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 9:02 am
Court] or branch in this state having jurisdiction in matters relating to the affairs of decedents. (9) “Descendant” of an individual means all of his [or her] descendants of all generations, with the relationship of parent and child at each generation being determined by the definition of child and parent contained in this [code].(10) “Devise,” when used as a noun means a testamentary disposition of real or personal property and, when used as a verb,… [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
[vi] See Scott D. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
Also in June last year, the United Nations Human Rights Council unanimously approved a parallel project “[r]equest[ing] the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to continue the work on domestic law remedies to address corporate involvement in gross human rights abuses, and to organize consultations with experts, States and other relevant stakeholders”. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:37 pm
The latter point has attracted a great deal of commentary to date, but some of that commentary has overlooked important details, so please don’t forget to read Section V at the end. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 5:44 am
Chanel established that it began using its mark in the United States in the 1930s, and the mark has consistently been ranked as one of the most recognized and famous brands in the United States. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 6:29 pm
Article V 1. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 6:29 pm
Article V 1. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 3:50 pm
Article V 1. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
JAMES MADISON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE UNITED STATES.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES5 U.S. 137; 2 L. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
Sawyer[2](The Steel Seizure Case), 343 U.S. 579 (1952)· United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 2:06 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum, which established that this form of jurisdiction is available only for claims that “touch and concern the territory of the United States” with “sufficient force” to displace the presumption against the extraterritorial application of U.S. law. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 10:33 am
This law as amended was the copyright law of the United States from July 1, 1909 through December 31, 1977. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 4:45 pm
” United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 12:14 pm
See United States v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:29 pm
Place as a legal subject brings forth thoughts of the nation-state, jurisdiction, sovereignty, and the norms in international law affecting the reach of a sovereign into the territory of another sovereign. [read post]
