Search for: "United States v. Watkins" Results 161 - 180 of 225
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2023, 4:01 am by jonathanturley
Professor Andrew Bond denounced the United States as a “sh*t nation” and then invited conservatives to quote him. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:05 am by Brian Finucane
The Resolution provides that the: President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to— (1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and (2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 9:04 pm by Carl Custer
More than 70 percent of Salmonella outbreaks in the United States have been associated with agricultural animals…Chen, R, Yang L, Pajor MS, Wiedmann M, Orsi RH. 2024. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:37 pm by David Lat
Thomas [Supreme Court of the United States via SCOTUSblog] Maples v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Kay, Mike Kesner, and Ed Sim, Pay Governance LLC, on Wednesday, July 12, 2023 Tags: Disclosure, Dodd-Frank Act, Executive Compensation, Pay for performance, SEC enforcement, TSR The Developing Litigation Risks from the ESG Backlash in the United States Posted by Rick S. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Kay, Mike Kesner, and Ed Sim, Pay Governance LLC, on Wednesday, July 12, 2023 Tags: Disclosure, Dodd-Frank Act, Executive Compensation, Pay for performance, SEC enforcement, TSR The Developing Litigation Risks from the ESG Backlash in the United States Posted by Rick S. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 1:29 am by Graham Smith
”John Thorpe MP put the State firmly ahead of the individual:“… In my view the State is in great danger, and no power which would tend to protect it should be withheld from the Government. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 2:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
Moreover, the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement approved the procedures after it conducted an independent review of the treatment, including review from a nurse and an independent doctor. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG)   United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
On 30 March 2022 there was an application in the case of Watkins -v- Mackle. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
United States (here), the Supreme Court recognized a presumption of reliance on an omission of material fact by a party with a duty to disclosure that information. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976), the Supreme Court of the United States considered prosecutorial immunity in the context of section 1983 actions. [read post]
22 Apr 2025, 9:05 pm by renholding
The Inflation Reduction Act’s passage roughly seven months after the Multiplan decision likely contributed to pushing SPACs out of the United States (and, therefore, Delaware). [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am by Matthew Ackerman
Qualified Immunity:  Federal law provides a cause of action for individuals who have been “depriv[ed] of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws” of the United States by a person acting under the color of law. [read post]