Search for: "Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA"
Results 161 - 180
of 207
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2011, 8:16 am
Power Co. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 2:37 pm
Numerous members of Congress and outside groups have accused the EPA of a “power grab” for proposing to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 2:39 pm
Co. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:32 am
Last week, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in one of the seminal cases in this area, American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 12:50 pm
EPA (citing Lujan v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:27 pm
The EPA, backed by 10 states and 6 trade associations including the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers and the Utility Air Regulatory Group, argues that the CAA, “did not authorize the EPA to address global climate change and that, in any event, executive policy specifically addressing global warming warranted the EPA’s refusal to regulate such areas. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 3:39 pm
EPA that the Clean Air Act covers greenhouse gases, I think it indisputable that Congress has occupied the field with a comprehensive regulatory scheme. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 4:56 pm
., v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:41 am
If the EPA enters into a deal with the utilities that is inconsistent with the Clean Air Act, then the agency can (and likely will) be sued by at least some environmental group. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:44 pm
The EPA wisely eliminated this rule last month. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:35 am
EPA that the Clean Air Act covers greenhouse gases, I think it indisputable that Congress has occupied the field with a comprehensive regulatory scheme. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Test methods matter: representative sampling and Clean Air Act test methods can survive EPA’s credible evidence rule. 25 J. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 1:32 pm
Business groups had no alternative but to seek a stay given the ramifications of EPA embarking on this regulatory path. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:58 am
Among other things, the court held the states had standing and that their nuisance claims were not displaced by federal regulatory authority over greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
Landfill gas collected by the separate Middlesex County Utilities Authority (MCUA) and Edgeboro Disposal Inc. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
But it was the ruling’s impact on utility regulation, not the cost, that prompted the appeals court to reverse the decision. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
The utility will also pay up to $100,000 for consultants – picked jointly by the utility and the activists — to critique the plan and advise the activists about any new problems. [read post]
