Search for: "V " Results 161 - 180 of 492,296
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2024, 3:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, the complaint fails to allege fraud with any particularity (see CPLR 3016[b]; see Browne v Lyft, Inc., 219 AD3d 445, 447 [2d Dept 2023]; Shah v Mitra, 171 ADed 971, 976 [2d Dept 2019]). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:37 am by Peter J. Sluka
  The merger was negotiated while the entire sports betting industry held its breath; the Supreme Court was considering Murphy v National Collegiate Athletic Assn, 584 U.S. 453 (2018) the case that allowed states to legalize sports gambling. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by Paul Caron
Beau Baez (Ohio Northern; Google Scholar), The Medical Expense Deduction: Physicians, Medicine Men, and Spirituality: Expenses for buckskins, baskets, and Navajo healing ceremonies were allowed as medical deductions in Tso v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 10:48 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
Ltd v Union Bank (2015) LPELR-26010(CA) 32-36 highlights his commitment to addressing conflict of laws situations even when the majority view falls short. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Secondly, the court considered that, while no previous case has directly answered the question raised by the appeal, the cases of Bulman & Dickson v Fenwick & Co [1894] 1 QB 179 and Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1963] AC 691 provided strong implicit support for MUR’s case. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For example, Justice Sotomayor’s opinion for the Court last year in Dubin v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm by Béligh Elbalti
To the contrary, and unlike the situation [under the previously applicable rules],[v] the Legislator has expanded the concept of enforceable titles (al-sanadat al-tanfidhiyya),[vi] which now includes criminal judgments involving restitution (radd), compensations (ta’widhat), fines (gharamat) and other civil rights (huquq madaniyyah). [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 7:43 pm by Tom Mayo
The latest blockbuster decision from SCOTUS is "the bump stock case," Garland v. [read post]